Zomma Greek: How Implied Volatility Changes Gamma
For educational purposes only; not investment advice.
Direct answer
Section titled “Direct answer”Zomma measures how an option’s Gamma changes when implied volatility changes, holding the model’s other inputs fixed:
Zomma = ∂Gamma/∂σ = ∂³V/(∂S²∂σ)
Gamma describes the local change in Delta for a small underlying-price move; Zomma describes how that local curvature is itself reshaped by an IV change. It is a higher-order, model-dependent sensitivity—not a separately traded cash flow, a directional forecast, or proof of what Gamma will be after a large market move.
Formula, sign, and units
Section titled “Formula, sign, and units”For a continuously compounded Black-Scholes-style European option with dividend yield q:
Gamma = e^(−qT) φ(d₁) / (Sσ√T)
Zomma = Gamma × (d₁d₂ − 1) / σ
where:
d₁ = [ln(S/K) + (r − q + σ²/2)T] / (σ√T)
d₂ = d₁ − σ√T
Calls and Puts with the same strike and expiry have the same Gamma and Zomma under this model. Near ATM, d₁d₂ is often below 1, so Zomma is commonly negative: raising IV spreads Delta’s transition over a wider price range and lowers peak Gamma; lowering IV can concentrate Gamma near the strike. Far from ATM, the sign can differ.
Units must be stated. If Gamma is Delta change per $1 underlying move and σ is decimal annualized IV, Zomma is Gamma change per 1.00 IV change. A platform quoting change per one volatility point (1% = 0.01) should display Zomma_decimal / 100. Some systems also scale Gamma, spot, multiplier, or percentage moves, so raw vendor numbers are not comparable without conventions.
Zomma is a partial derivative: spot, time, rates, dividends, and the rest of the surface are held fixed. Real markets usually move several inputs together. Spot-IV dependence, skew movement, elapsed time, jumps, and early-exercise features can dominate this isolated sensitivity.
Local estimate versus full repricing
Section titled “Local estimate versus full repricing”Suppose one option has:
- Gamma
0.040per$1underlying move; - Zomma
−0.060per1.00decimal IV; - standard multiplier
100.
For a small IV increase from 40% to 41%, Δσ = +0.01:
ΔGamma ≈ Zomma × Δσ = −0.060 × 0.01 = −0.0006
Estimated new Gamma is 0.0394. Per one standard contract, the Gamma-scaled Delta change for a $1 move shifts from about 4.00 to 3.94 share-equivalents, under the stated local convention.
Now consider an event IV drop from 80% to 35%, so Δσ = −0.45. Linear extrapolation would give:
ΔGamma ≈ −0.060 × (−0.45) = +0.027
and an estimated Gamma of 0.067. That is not a reliable event forecast: the shock is large, Zomma changes along the path, time passes, spot can gap, and skew can reprice. Recalculate the full option and portfolio under the post-event surface; use the linear number only to understand the initial direction and rough scale.
Analysis and risk controls
Section titled “Analysis and risk controls”- Record valuation model, exercise style, spot or forward convention, rates, dividends, time clock, IV source, and surface interpolation.
- State whether IV input is decimal, percentage, or volatility points and whether Gamma/Zomma include the contract multiplier.
- Verify Zomma with central differences: reprice Gamma at
σ + handσ − h, then compare[Γ(σ+h) − Γ(σ−h)]/(2h)across severalhvalues. - Recompute each strike and expiry; do not multiply one representative Zomma across a heterogeneous portfolio.
- Shock spot, time, IV level, skew, and term structure jointly, especially around events and near expiration.
- Use full repricing for large IV moves, price gaps, barriers, discrete dividends, early exercise, or sparse surface wings.
- Aggregate long/short sign, quantity, multiplier, and currency consistently; net Zomma can conceal offsetting bucket risk.
- Compare predicted and realized changes in Gamma, Delta, and P&L; unexplained residual is model, data, surface, or execution risk.
- Prioritize Delta, Gamma, Vega, liquidity, maximum loss, and settlement before relying on a third-order sensitivity.
- Read product specifications and OCC disclosures; Zomma does not alter contractual exercise, assignment, or margin obligations.
Common misconceptions
Section titled “Common misconceptions”- “Zomma predicts implied volatility.” It measures a conditional sensitivity; it does not forecast IV direction.
- “Negative Zomma is bearish.” The sign describes Gamma’s response to IV, not the underlying’s expected return.
- “Zomma is the same as Vega.” Vega changes option value with IV; Zomma changes Gamma with IV.
- “The same-strike Call and Put have opposite Zomma.” In the stated European model they share Gamma and Zomma.
- “A one-point IV move means
1.00.” One volatility point is normally0.01in decimal-IV input. - “One vendor’s number can be copied into another system.” Scaling, model, surface, clock, and dividend assumptions differ.
- “Linear Zomma explains an IV crush.” A large event shock requires full repricing along a changed surface.
- “More Greeks automatically improve risk control.” A precise higher-order number cannot repair bad prices, liquidity, sizing, or expiration planning.
Related topics
Section titled “Related topics”Authoritative sources
Section titled “Authoritative sources”- The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities — Fischer Black and Myron Scholes, Journal of Political Economy (1973)
- Theory of Rational Option Pricing — Robert C. Merton, Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science (1973)
- Options: The Basics and the Greeks — FINRA
- Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options — Options Clearing Corporation